Shutdown Logan River Academy - Banner

For news please:

Shutdown Logan River Instagram

Click here to read our petition...

Logan River Academy is a residential treatment facility in Utah, a state where there is comparable lack of oversight and relevant legislation to safe guard vulnerable students in residential programs (1.) We believe in the merit of scientifically tested and accepted residential treatment programs, but do not believe the program at LRA is either. LRA's residential program is not properly accredited (2,) they belong to NATSAP, a non-accrediting voluntary membership organization which gives the appearance of accreditation/licensure, but that does not enforce any professional and/or ethical standards on its member programs (3.)

Our own research into these programs has turned up very scary things. The policies in place at Logan River Academy, detailed below, are not only cruel, they are ineffective and, in our opinion, fraudulent. Their harsh discipline policies have the end effect of cheaply warehousing kids while they accept $7,500 - $8,900 per child per month from naive parents and courts. We understand they pay many of their staff, who have direct supervision of special needs kids, close to minimum wage.

Although there were meetings on Capitol Hill, and The House of Representatives even passed a bill (4,) clearly stating the problem, it remains (5):

The Government Accountability Office has done a report as well:

Many students in this program spend most of their days sitting straight forward, not allowed to move, look at another student, or make any noise; think detention but much longer and more strict. The program calls it “DEVO” (6) and they hand it out for any and all infractions; for example, one student was punished with a significant amount (hours) of “DEVO” time for returning to his room with a moist towelette from the dining area to clean his glasses, thinking it was permitted. They called it contraband and gave him excessive “DEVO,” time. This is just one example. We have first hand accounts of students receiving up to 2000 “DEVO,” hours for a single infraction and students spending over 100 consecutive days in “DEVO.”

“DEVO,” is short for “development.” A true and tragic irony given the consequences of its imposition on children.

There is another level of “DEVO,” that is much worse. It is called “Precaution.” Some students report allegations of being stripped naked for it. I fear that it is so they cannot strangle themselves with their clothing (7) (8.) If true this strategy may also mean they are improperly attempting to care for suicide risks without the proper facilities and personnel. Other students report spending every waking moment in “DEVO,” on “Precaution,” completely isolated from peers for up to 30 days on end (8.) During this time they don't attend class, they don't develop socially, they are forced to sit still and quiet. According to the American Academy of Chlid & Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP) (9.:)

“The potential psychiatric consequences of prolonged solitary confinement are well recognized and include depression, anxiety and psychosis. Due to their developmental vulnerability, juvenile offenders are at particular risk of such adverse reactions. Furthermore, the majority of suicides in juvenile correctional facilities occur when the individual is isolated or in solitary confinement.

Solitary confinement should be distinguished from brief interventions such as "time out," which may be used as a component of a behavioral treatment program in facilities serving children and/or adolescents, or seclusion, which is a short term emergency procedure, the use of which is governed by federal, state and local laws and subject to regulations developed by the Joint Commission, CARF and supported by the National Commission of Correctional Healthcare (NCHHC), the American Correctional Association (ACA) and other accrediting entities.

The Joint Commission states that seclusion should only be used for the least amount of time possible for the immediate physical protection of an individual, in situations where less restrictive interventions have proven ineffective. The Joint Commission specifically prohibits the use of seclusion "as a means of coercion, discipline, convenience or staff retaliation." A lack of resources should never be a rationale for solitary confinement.”

I am unable to find any scientific literature regarding the benefits and success rate of “DEVO.” In fact, I am unable to find any scientific literature or studies about it at all (10.) In my opinion, it is pseudoscience at best and torture at worst. We know that one student who was just removed from the program had been placed in solitary confinement at least twice.

The National Institutes of Health have established guidelines for effective child discipline (11.) They are:
“To be effective, discipline needs to be:
    given by an adult with an affective bond to the child;
    consistent, close to the behaviour needing change;
    perceived as ‘fair’ by the child;
    developmentally and temperamentally appropriate; and
    self-enhancing, ie, ultimately leading to self-discipline.”

Also according to AACAP (12:)

“Be sure that the residential program has a method of maintaining safe behaviors, promoting positive behaviors, and preventing aggression. Make sure that punishments and verbal intimidations are prohibited.”

Hours and hours of timeout lasting long after an infraction, doled out by complete strangers who are often perceived as sadistic fails to meet a single one of these standards. Further, the Child Welfare League of America says of timeout (13,) “Sometimes children need time to calm down and collect themselves. (Adults do to!) Used sparingly, with consistency and repetition, it must be viewed as teaching the child, not punishing.”

Certainly hours and hours of what I'll call “enhanced” detention is not “sparingly,” and must be considered “punishing."

The United States Surgeon General has also weighed in on the matter (14:)

“In behavioral token programs, youths are rewarded for conforming to rules, exhibiting prosocial behavior, and not exhibiting antisocial or violent behavior. Like some other residential approaches, behavioral token programs can have positive effects on targeted behaviors while youths are institutionalized. However, when this strategy is used alone, any such effects disappear when youths leave the program.”

In addition to this, no truly independent entity is able to monitor the students' progress and wellbeing, or more importantly the lack thereof. You see, while the students are made to suffer for minor infractions, the administration of the facility do not hold themselves accountable for their own poor and dangerous results. As noted in their state accreditation report they have a very high staff turnover rate and do not provide student performance data or curriculum maps (15.)

Please tell the parents of the children at LRA that they have made the wrong choice for their children and to remove them from the program before any more emotional damage is inflicted on them. Please tell the Los Angeles Unifed School District (and all other public districts) to immediately remove any students from Logan River Academy and to cease sending students there. Please tell Logan River Academy to stop using their “DEVO” techniques, that they are dangerous, unnecessary and counterproductive to nurturing intact adults. In many cases the families of these kids have been tricked by, in my opinion, snake oil salesman to sending/keeping their children to/in these programs against their will. These kids, and please remember: they are kids - are innocent despite their behavioral problems, and have been left with no other advocates.


Logan River Academy
Larry Carter, Owner - Logan River Academy
Lori Connin, Owner - Logan River Academy
Mark Petersen, Owner - Logan River Academy
Mont Criddle, LMFT, Residential Director - Logan River Academy
Shannon Kegerries, CMHC - Logan River Academy
Maureen McDonald, Clinical Services & Academic Coordinator - Logan River Academy
Mike Bodrero, Adventure Learning Coordinator - Logan River Academy
Heather Capson, Admissions - Logan River Academy
Kirk Farmer, Director of Academics - Logan River Academy
Liz Severe, Registered Nurse - Logan River Academy
Jeff Smith, Owner - Logan River Academy
Omid Gohari,
Kat Eden - (650) 366-3380 Ext. 2218, Director, Marketing Communications -
Ray Renati, Logan River Academy Parent - 650-245-9026
Debra Duardo - 213-241-3840, Executive Director - Student Health & Human Services, LA Unified School District
Sharyn Howell - 213-241-6701, Executive Director - Special Education, LA Unified School District
Terri Barach, Therapist Intern - Outreach Children - 800-492-2731 or 714-547-1163
Dan Barach
Annette Bohling, J.D. Chief Accreditation Officer - AdvancED

To Terri & Dan Barach,
Apologize publicly to your son, an innocent child, whom you confined against his will in a cruel manner for nearly a year with neither due process nor a real medical need. Start doing someting about Logan River.

Logan River Academy,
Stop using your "development"/"Precaution"/isolation techniques, they are dangerous, unnecessary and counterproductive to nurturing intact adults.

Annette Bohling & AdvancED,
Perform a fully independant investigation of Logan River Academy and their policies, requiring them abide by NIH, FTC, Surgeon General, and AACAP guidelines to maintain accredidation - so they don't harm their clients.

Debra Duardo, Sharyn Howell & LA USD,
Immediately remove all LA USD students from Logan River Academy and cease sending students there on IEPs.

Ray Renati,
Pull your child from Logan River Academy now.

Omid Gohari & Kat Eden,
Delist Logan River Academy as,,,,, and others already have.

[Your name]

Please click here to sign this petition on

What is a Twitter Storm?

A "Twitter Storm," occurs whenever a number of people suddenly start tweeting into the same Twitter hashtag, especially when the hashtag starts "trending," on twitter as a result. People familiar with Twitter have seen its "Trends," box, and many, if not most, have clicked on a trending hashtag from the trends box to learn more about what so many other people are tweeting about. Most Twitter storms are spontaneous and result from mass interest in a recent event. Some are sports events, like #WorldSeries or #WorldCup, others have to do with news stories people want to express themselves about, such as #NelsonMendela. Yet others result from shared civic experiences, such as #VeteransDay, #JFK, and many others.

There is another category of Twitter Storm though that overall people are less aware of: the planned, activist Twitter storms. These are more like a flash mob performing a synchronized dance in a public place all of a sudden. Activists get together days or even weeks beforehand, pick a date and time, recruit others, and spread a list of tweets for participants to start sending out simultaneously when the time is right. In the best case, the hashtag they tweet makes it into the trends box on Twitter, gaining regional, national, and/or global visibility. This visibility causes others to also start tweeting into the hashtag, and a feedback cycle can form. The more people who tweet the hashtag, the longer it trends, and the longer it trends, the more and more new participants start tweeting into it.

What do Twitter Storms accomplish?

You may be thinking "that's great, but what use is it to 'trend,' on Twitter? What does it accomplish?" The first answer to this question is that it raises awareness and helps new people find a cause they care about. Additionally, the modern media pays attention to Twitter trends, and they often make the press. For example, the first #ShutLoganRiver twitter storm generated most of the articles on our LRA Resources page. If the cause has a petition and/or social media presence, as #ShutLoganRiver does, a Twitter storm can help bring in signatures, followers, likes, etc.

In democratic societies, trending on Twitter is a great way of demonstrating that people care about a cause and want to get involved in it. Given how difficult it can be to get the mainstream media to run a story, Twitter storms are perhaps the best way for a story to either get into the mainstream media, or bypass it entirely and still reach a large, global audience.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

  • Q: I have very few Twitter followers, or would have to start a brand new Twitter account to join a storm. Can my participation still make a difference?
    A: Yes! The way the Twitter trends work under the hood, the number of followers on an account HAS NO DIRECT IMPACT on trending. Even accounts with 0 followers can help a hashtag trend. Joining a Twitter Storm can also be a great way to meet other like-minded people on Twitter and gain followers. Original tweets during a storm that are funny or otherwise engaging are likely to be retweeted to many people who would not have heard you otherwise. Polite and provocative tweets that get people to respond into the hashtag are a great way to help the hashtag trend!
  • Q: I have a lot of followers, but that won't help the hashtag trend. How can I help the followers I've worked so hard to gain have an effect on trending the hashtag?
    A: Simple, ask them to join you and be sure to send them the link to this article so they know the rules and strategy! It is best to start recruiting days before the storm. It is also effective to watch your Twitter "Home," page the hour or so before the storm and ask the followers you see active at the time to participate.
  • Q: How fast should I send tweets during a storm?
    A: We recommend that you send one tweet every 3-5 minutes. The way Twitter selects hashtags for the trends box, the number of people tweeting into the hashtag is the number 1 criteria. So, it is more important that many people from all over the place are tweeting at the same time than it is to have a few people tweeting really fast. Additionally, if you send Tweets too quickly (more than 116 tweets in an hour and/or 1000 in a day,) Twitter will temporarily block your account from sending any tweets at all. This is referred to as "Twitter Jail."
  • Q: I have ideas for different and/or better tweets than what's been provided in the storm package. Should I send them instead?
    A: Yes! For trending purposes, Twitter also examines the uniqueness of tweets being sent into the hashtag. It is actually better if you customize the tweets or send completely unique ones. Please just keep in mind the goal is to be engaging and help the cause. Profanity, cynicism, and the like turn people away and can actually hurt the cause.
  • Q: My account is in Twitter Jail during the storm, is there anything I can do to keep participating?
    A: Yes, you can create another Twitter account (remember the number of followers on an account has no direct impact on trends.) Twitter only allows an email address to be registered to one account at a time, so you should use a different email account to register a new account. Additionally, there are some tricks of the trade. For instance, gmail ignores periods in email addresses. So if you have This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and your twitter account is Twitter Jailed, you can register another Twitter account to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..
  • Q: Can I add my own hashtag to tweets during a storm?
    A: Yes, however please be aware that tweets with 4 or more hashtags in them are completely ignored by Twitter trends. So we recommend a maximum of 3 hashtags per tweet. Also, a tweet with one hashtag contributes the most trending power to its single hashtag. A tweet with two hashtags contributes less than half of this amount to each of its two hashtags, and similar for tweets with three hashtags.
  • Q: What can I do to help before the storm?
    A: Spend some time recruiting others. The only thing better than you tweeting during the storm would be you and a group of your followers all tweeting during the storm! Send them this URL so they know the rules of the Twitter road.
  • Q: I ran out of tweets from the package to send, and Twitter won't let me send the same tweets twice. What should I do now?
    A: You can come up with new tweets of your own and send them into the hashtag. Add your unique perspective to the conversation, and hopefully get others to respond to you in the hashtag. Asking polite, but provocative questions is a great way to get others to join the conversation and help the hashtag trend! Also, you can change as little as one character in a previous tweet and send it again. Changing "and" to "&" is a good example of this.